Religion and politics don’t mix


Religion and politics don’t mix

Los Angeles Times: On Sept. 12, 1960, Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kennedy delivered a speech to Protestant ministers in Houston that is regarded as a turning point not just in that year’s election but in the decline of anti-Catholicism in the United States. “I believe,” Kennedy said, “in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute — where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote.”

Last week, a prominent Roman Catholic prelate, also addressing a Protestant audience in Houston, said that Kennedy’s speech was “sincere, compelling, articulate — and wrong.” Archbishop Charles J. Chaput of Denver, a leader of the church’s conservative wing, complained that Kennedy had “profoundly undermined the place not just of Catholics but of all religious believers in America’s public life. ... Today, half a century later, we’re paying for the damage.”

Chaput isn’t alone in faulting Kennedy for seeming to imply that a political leader’s faith has no connection to his public life. But Kennedy’s main intention was to assure Protestants suspicious of Catholicism that he would make decisions “in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates.”

Abortion is the key

The tension Kennedy was describing may sound familiar. It figures in the continuing controversy over whether Catholic politicians must embrace the church’s opposition to abortion and whether a candidate who fails to do so should be denied Holy Communion or drummed out of office by Catholic voters. It is telling that Chaput described abortion as the “foundational human rights issue of our lifetime,” and it’s no coincidence that in 2008, he suggested that presidential candidate Joe Biden, a Catholic who is an abortion rights advocate, shouldn’t approach the communion rail.

Publicly forcing politicians to choose between their faith and their political judgment creates the very impression that Kennedy sought to avoid, with positive consequences for pluralism and religious tolerance. As we see it, Kennedy’s position is still the correct one.

Copyright 2010 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More like this from vindy.com

Subscribe Today

Sign up for our email newsletter to receive daily news.

Want more? Click here to subscribe to either the Print or Digital Editions.