Youngstown News, Probe of Oakhill followed complex, long path
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Columbiana


Commercial
bedroom, bath
$1850000


Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 2 bath
$80000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Probe of Oakhill followed complex, long path


Published: Sat, July 31, 2010 @ 12:10 a.m.

By PETER H. MILLIKEN

milliken@vindy.com

photo

YOUNGSTOWN

The Ohio Ethics Commission probe of Mahoning County’s purchase of Oakhill Renaissance Place started with a local lawsuit by a corporation that is now under indictment.

Paul M. Nick, a special prosecutor in the Oakhill case, said the Oakhill case stemmed from a referral from Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County prosecutor. That referral concerned issues that arose from the Cafaro Co.’s lawsuit to rescind the purchase.

The Cafaro Co. is the former landlord for the county’s Department of Job and Family Services at Garland Plaza. JFS moved from there to Oakhill in July 2007.

The case took a long time to build as documents were gathered and testimony was taken by a grand jury. Proceedings needed to be extended three months beyond the planned conclusion of the grand jury’s regular four-month term April 30.

“We simply did not have enough time to obtain compliance with subpoenas for records,” explained Nick, the state ethics commission’s chief investigative counsel.

Other reasons besides the complexity of the case were the prosecutors’ desire to have the same grand jury hear the entire case, and the desire to give persons of interest a chance to testify before the grand jury, he said.

Nick said he perceives any debate now over the merits of the county’s purchase of Oakhill as a distraction from the ethical issues that laid the foundation for the indictment.

The 73-count indictment was filed Thursday in Mahoning County Common Pleas Court. It charges seven people and three business entities with corruption related to the Oakhill purchase.

Charges include engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, conspiracy, perjury, bribery, money laundering, tampering with records, disclosure of confidential information, conflict of interest, filing a false financial disclosure statement and soliciting or accepting improper compensation.

Those indicted are Anthony M. Cafaro Sr., retired Cafaro Co. president, the company itself and two of its affiliates; Flora Cafaro, part-owner of the Cafaro Co.; county Commissioner John A. McNally IV, county Auditor Michael V. Sciortino, former county Treasurer John B. Reardon; former county Job and Family Services Director John Zachariah; and Atty. Martin Yavorcik of Boardman.

Yavorcik, who ran unsuccessfully for prosecutor against Gains in 2008, and Flora Cafaro are charged with only one count each of money laundering.

Money laundering is concealment of the source type, location, ownership or control of money, Nick explained. However, he declined to be specific about the counts pertaining to Yavorcik and Flora Cafaro.

The indictment alleges that McNally, Reardon, Sciortino and Zachariah received free legal services from the Cafaro Co. in exchange for their hindrance of the county’s acquisition and occupancy of Oakhill.

The perjury counts allege that those four men lied under oath in video depositions they gave before the July 2007 trial of the lawsuit, in which the Cafaro Co. unsuccessfully sought to rescind the county’s purchase of Oakhill.

Nick wouldn’t be specific, but he said they attempted to conceal their participation in the conspiracy to hinder the purchase.

As for some defendants’ contention that they did no more than speak to Anthony Cafaro as they would to any other constituent, Nick said: “They certainly weren’t open about the fact that that was going on.”

Reaction continued to emerge Friday.

The Youngstown/Warren Regional Chamber said the indictment “reminds us that we are all governed by the rule of law. The criminal justice process must be allowed to be played out with the realization that those charged are innocent until proven guilty.”

Atty. David Betras, county Democratic Party chairman, said: “Like most residents of Mahoning County, I am deeply concerned about the indictments handed down ... As an attorney and officer of the court, I have complete confidence in the judicial system. I think that we should allow that process to take its course.”

Betras also defended the local Democratic Party against a Thursday evening attack from the local GOP chairman, Mark Munroe, who said the Mahoning Valley “has once again been tarnished and embarrassed by the actions of Democrats.”

“Instead of casting broad-brush aspersions and hurling insults and invective, maybe Mr. Munroe and his cohorts should sit down and try to develop a plan for moving our region forward,” Betras said.

Atty. James B. Callen, former president of the now-dormant Citizens League of Greater Youngstown, which campaigned vigorously against corruption in government, had another perspective.

“I think it could be one of the most important developments in the history of this community because it addresses the problem that has been a handicap to this community for the last half-century, at least,” namely corruption, Callen said.

“It’s, in a way, a potential culmination of the investigations and the efforts that have been going on since the 1980s” to eliminate corruption in the Mahoning Valley, which has damaged the community’s reputation and self-image and business-attraction potential, he added. “My hope is that these cases are prosecuted vigorously,” Callen said.

He characterized the alleged attempts by county officials to hinder the county’s acquisition and occupancy of Oakhill as “special-interest governing at its worst.”


Comments

1davidjohn(144 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

getting free legal advice?

perhaps lying in a video deposition?

these are the crimes that they spent years investigating?

this sounds like a political vendetta by gains and tablack when there are real problems to address

oak hill is not a distraction mr. nicks
it is the issue and it is bleeding the county

Suggest removal:

2Brown(448 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

don't jump the gun folks.

Suggest removal:

3UnionForever(1452 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

The valley will never change until the DemoCROOKS are gone. You have a chance to start the ball rolling with the November election.

Suggest removal:

4ytownredux(53 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

Oakhill is not bleeding the County, do some research and stop just parroting whatever you read. Do you realize in the 3 years since the move, you have SAVED over a million and a half dollars PLUS utilities that was paid to the Cafaro's dilapidated building. We have also saved whatever the County Coroner was paying in rent before the building was bought. Do you remember there was a 5 million dollar bond that was put out when the building was purchased for renovations and that there is still about a third of that left to help get the other County entities moved into the building SAVING even more rent money given to others.

The taxes that may or not be due, (they are still being appealed to the State and not owed yet,) would be paid by the million and a half plus we have saved in Cafaro rent alone.

Have you toured Oakhill? I hope you do before you knock the building. It WAS a hospital, it was built well and cared for in most of the building. We should be finding ways to fill up building and save on outgoing rent for county entities and spend that money on the utilities or improving services.

As for the indictments, they are NOT about whether the building purchase was a good idea or not, they are about County officials (who happen to be Democrat, would have happened with Republicans too if they wanted Cafaro backing) who went above and beyond opposing the purchase, but worked hand in hand with someone outside the County who had a vested interest in keeping the County JFS in their building and keeping their cash cow going and the first building that daddy ever built afloat.

Suggest removal:

5palbubba(608 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

Ytown redux has the same old tired arguement that it "would have happened with Republicans too". Without facts they just say whatever they want. Like, we've saved a million and a half, we'll save more, it's all good. All of this is just unsubstantiated talk. I could say only the Democrats are corrupt, It's cost the county 5 million dollars, the building is a shambles, etc. Do I need facts to back that up? I happen to agree with davidjohn that as usual they are spending their time, effort and money on the least of the counties problems. How dare these men disagree with the county gestapo.

Suggest removal:

6davidjohn(144 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

i have been to oak hill

and the public probably doesn't know dave ludt had a wing named after himself-how's that

it is a very old hospital that is not designed for modern uses

it is silly to suggest because there is no more rent to garland that jobs and families has no operating expenses

in addition to the million dollar tax lien the ongoing utility costs are astronomical

the maintenance has tripled the county's maintenance costs

there are large areas sealed off because there is no use for them

employees say there is mold that is visible where the wallpaper is torn away

the neighborhood is ghetto and unsafe

don't you love the argument it would have cost millions to move the coroners office
does the coroner even do autopsies

and what would you need. a table, refrigeration unit, some tools. millions?

the building is 100 years old it ain't getting better

great deal for the taxpayers

Suggest removal:

7Silence_Dogood(755 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

Betras also defended the local Democratic Party by reminding Marcus57 that it is not fair to point out the fact that his long three part list was a list of ONLY DEMOCRATS.
Thats right folks that list has only DEMOCRATS on it, I quess that speaks volumes for those that want to truelly think about it.

Suggest removal:

8ytown1(369 comments)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

How many Democrats are really Republicans in hiding, knowing that is the only way to get elected here in the valley?

Quite a few I suspect. So yes there probably is a few convicted Democrats that really started out as Republicans.

Crooked Politicians do not know party lines, that has been clear for years.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: