- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -


« News Home

Boardman’s financial crisis will confront new trustees

Published: Sun, January 3, 2010 @ 12:00 a.m.

The refusal by former Boardman Township trustees Kathy Miller and Robyn Gallitto to sign a letter relating to the state auditor’s analysis of government’s financial condition prompts two key questions: Were Miller and Gallitto being intransigent because they lost their re-election bids in the November general election? Or, were they being responsible stewards of the public treasury by refusing to accept the financial forecast submitted by the township’s fiscal officer, William Leicht?

At first blush, their refusal to sign would appear to be sour grapes. Miller, who served as a trustee for eight years, and Gallitto, who was on the board for a four-year term, did not expect to be rejected by the voters. To be sure, the township’s fiscal crisis was a major issue, but the incumbents had reason to believe residents would acknowledge the impact the national and global economic recessions were having on governments at all levels.

We did, which is why we endorsed Miller and Gallitto for re-election. Neither of the candidates who won in November, Thomas Costello nor Brad Calhoun, campaigned on a platform attacking the incumbents for mismanaging the township’s finances. In fact, the main issue in the election was the perception of disunity among the three trustees, Miller, Gallitto and Larry Moliterno.

Thus, we do not buy the sour grapes explanation for what occurred recently with the state auditor’s analysis of Boardman’s finances. Instead, we believe the two now former trustees were just not willing to take at face value the financial information the township’s fiscal officer provided to state auditors.

Fiscal watch

Early in 2009, trustees asked the state for an analysis to determine if Boardman met the conditions for fiscal watch. The status is triggered when expenditures outpace revenues. Watch is a precursor to a declaration of fiscal emergency, which would result in a state commission being appointed to oversee the township’s finances.

But because Miller and Gallitto refused to sign the letter from the state auditor’s office, the agency was unable to certify the deficit in the general fund and determine the existence of a fiscal watch.

“We rely upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial forecast as part of the information that allows us to do our analysis,” said Steve Faulkner, a spokesman for the state auditor’s office.

Moliterno did sign the letter, contending that state auditors completed their review of the township’s books and had access to all information and databases pertaining to the finances. He said he talked to Leicht and state officials before making his decision.

But, Miller, for one, indicated that what the state was after was a confirmation of the veracity of Leicht’s information. She said she could not offer such confirmation because she was not involved in the compilation of the data.

“As a trustee, I could not vouch for the information and thus could not certify by letter that the information submitted to the state auditor was complete and accurate,” Miller said.

Indeed, the tension between the fiscal officer and the trustees is not a new phenomenon. Last October, there was a Vindicator story that said trustees were frustrated over the difficulty in getting information from Leicht.

Here’s what Moliterno had to say about the budget numbers:

“The sooner we come up with numbers that we are comfortable with and can agree on, the sooner we can start working together to solve our problems.”

Then-trustee Gallitto hit the nail on the head with her statement, “Everyone is very frustrated.”

Now, it falls to Costello and Calhoun to figure out whether the financial projections prepared by Leicht are credible. Moliterno obviously has confidence in what the fiscal officer has submitted to the state, but what about his new colleagues?

At least Costello is familiar with the township’s budget, having served for six years as a trustee before being defeated in 2005. But Calhoun, a Boardman school teacher who ran unsuccessfully for trustee in 2007, is a roookie.

How long a learning curve will he need? It’s not at all clear.

Clock’s ticking

What is clear is that the trustees in Boardman do not have the luxury of time in dealing with the township’s finances. A financial forecast developed by the state auditor’s office for 2010 looked at the years 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. What it found was that from a $5.26 million year-end balance four years ago, the township ended 2008 with $873,000, and seemed headed for a negative balance last year.

However, in November, the township found out that it would receive a one-time payment of $566,000 as a result of voters in May approving an electric-aggregation proposal, and $220,000 in inheritance tax. That unanticipated revenue erased the deficit and allowed for some capital improvement projects.

This year, however, the budget will be dripping red ink unless revenues increase or cuts in appropriations are made.


1Tugboat(759 comments)posted 6 years, 6 months ago

90% of the Vindicator's articles or blogs the past four years pertaining to Miller and Gallitto were derogatory. Check your archives. So why then would you expect the electorate to keep them? And let's not forget - they both sought Boccieri's seat.

Suggest removal:

2apollo(1227 comments)posted 6 years, 6 months ago

There goes Tug with his usual meaningless drivel. What does it matter that they sought Boccieri's seat? Politicians often run for higher office Tug, that's not unusual unless you are someone without the education and experience to do so. Perhaps just a secretary for a moving company might not desire higher office.

But, the problems in Boardman are much deeper. The townships employees have bankrupted the township. Using inheritance tax revenues as if they were not one time unreliable sources of income and building it into contracts that were unsustainable but that relied on that inheritance money. Voodoo economics that Leicht, Mancini, and Costello promoted as smart policy many years ago.

When will the next levy be on the ballot, I'll bet May.

Watch the increases in pensions too.

Fiscal watch and then emergency will be Boardman's future, probably in 2010.

Yet with all of Boardman's fiscal problems, Tug will still be complaining about curb cuts, Miller, and Gallitto. Got to protect his rookie candidate Calhoun I suppose. The same Calhoun who had no problem removing his ratings from the "ratemyteacher" website because they weren't so flattering.

The cabal is in complete control now so they won't have anyone to blame. It owns all 3 candidates and the fiscal officer.

Suggest removal:

3Tugboat(759 comments)posted 6 years, 6 months ago

'Politicians often run for higher office Tug,..'

In their case, it was more like running away from lower office.

'Yet with all of Boardman's fiscal problems, Tug will still be complaining about curb cuts..'

OIC, Apollo, that kind of government waste is apparently OK with you.

Suggest removal:

4apollo(1227 comments)posted 6 years, 6 months ago

Curb cuts benefit the people Tug, I know all you care about is anything that takes money away from the trough feeders which of course you are one. There had to be curbs there anyways Tug, did the cuts actually cost more than regular curbs? I doubt it.

How about Moliterno suddenly approving less firemen at stations to keep all 3 open? He changed his mind after being against it previously. Maybe because Miller was for it before, the cabal director told him to oppose it back then?

Suggest removal:

5harleydog(243 comments)posted 6 years, 5 months ago

The people of Boardman elected dumb, dumber and dumbest as trustees. What makes anyone think that Costello could be any better. He is the one that started this mess with Miss Personality Mancini. Moliterno has been in for 2 years now and what has he accomplished. Calhoun reputation is not that good but we will give him a chance to prove himself. Leicht MUST GO>

Suggest removal:

6harleydog(243 comments)posted 6 years, 5 months ago

P.S. I would never sign anything that Leicht has his fingers on. He couldn't add 2+2.

Suggest removal:

7apollo(1227 comments)posted 6 years, 5 months ago

Correct Harleydog, Costello was the rubber stamper for Mancini who along with Leicht were the architects of this fiscal mess. Allowing the former administrator to "negotiate" contracts that he then benefited from. Allowing the usage of inheritance money for general fund expenditures. This group might agree on everything since they all owe their elections to the cabal but agreement isn't going to make the financial problems disappear. Ask Moliterno why he suddenly changed his mind about the firehouse staffing??? The idea that originally Kathy Miller suggested and Larry opposed. I guess NOW it's a good idea.

The state will be running things soon.

Suggest removal:

8Tugboat(759 comments)posted 6 years, 5 months ago

'Curb cuts benefit the people Tug,'

Ap: When they connect to sidewalks, yes. Get out and look at them when the snow melts. They are ridiculous. As of now, the 'improvements' to 224 have done nothing to make the area more walkable nor do they meet the State's own criteria. You are still forced to get in your car to go from business to business.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes