Keep the money in Ohio
EDITOR:
I am troubled when I see a politician like Sen. Voinovich who lived off the taxpayers as long as I can remember appear on television and use his office urging voters to vote no on Issue 3 premised on nothing more but a prophetic notion that a passing of Issue 3 will not create 34,000 new jobs and that the four casinos pursuant to the constitutional amendment regarding Issue 3 represents a lucrative windfall for the wealthiest families.
Every year, thousands of Ohioans take over $1 billion a year to out-of-state casinos when they could be spending that money here in Ohio. How many trips are Ohioans making a year to gamble? According to a study by the Innovation Group, a respected source of gaming industry analysis, Ohioans took almost 17.8 million trips out of state to gamble in 2008. Go to the bank. Take out $121 for each member of your household. Put the money in an envelope. Get on the interstate, drive into a neighboring state and throw the envelope out the window.
What happens if Issue 3 doesn’t pass? The Innovation Group study predicts Ohioans will spend over $1.5 billion out-of-state by 2013. The study also predicts that the number of trips to out-of-state casinos will rise to about 18.8 million — another million wasted opportunities for the state. Ohioans can continue driving to neighboring states and throwing money out the window, or Ohio can say yes to Issue 3, and bring that money home.
JOE SABINO
Columbiana
Comments
You can also make yourself more marketable by earning a degree in Crime Scene investigation check http://bit.ly/3fyWG4
Really? That's your argument for Issue 3?! Give me a break. I'm glad one of our politicians, Voinovich, finally stepped up and took a stand against this ridiculous issue. Issue 3 is short sighted and makes NO sense to put into the Ohio State Constitution. I'm not against gambling. However, I am against giving a monopoly to two casino owners and allowing them to set their own tax rate. There's a time and place for gambling and this isn't the way Ohio should go about it. Why can't we do what Pennsylvania did and actually let the best bid win?! What a concept! Pennsylvania's tax rate on Casinos is 55%...why shouldn't Ohio get the same rate? You argue that Ohio is throwing away revenue by not "keeping the money in Ohio", I argue that they would still be throwing away money if they do not negotiate the best deal possible in regard to gambling. The local municipalities should have a say in where the Casinos go as well. If Ohio is going to allow gambling we should get the best deal possible...this isn't even close to that.
And the dollars keep leaving the state....effective tax rate 0%.