Before the public utilities commision of ohio (PDF)
Residential renewable energy credit purchase program (PDF)
First energy legal dept (PDF)
PUCO gave the order after hearing from irate FirstEnergy customers.
By Marc Kovac
COLUMBUS — The head of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio has called on FirstEnergy to halt a controversial plan to distribute energy-efficient light bulbs to customers and charge them over the next three years for the costs involved.
The move by Alan Schriber, commission chairman, came after his agency and Gov. Ted Strickland received high volumes of phone calls and e-mails from customers angry about the costs and methodology.
In a released statement, Schriber said: “I have asked FirstEnergy to postpone deployment of its compact fluorescent-light-bulb program until the commission can thoroughly assess the costs associated with this program. ... Although the PUCO allowed FirstEnergy to implement its program, we did not approve the charge that will appear on monthly bills as a result. ... The PUCO has not approved these additional dollars nor have we received a request by the company to do so.”
He added, “Until the PUCO has specific details regarding the program costs, FirstEnergy should not deploy its compact fluorescent-light-bulb program.”
In a statement released to the press, the company said: “At the request of PUCO Chairman Alan Schriber, FirstEnergy has agreed to further discuss with the commission its PUCO-approved program to provide compact fluorescent light bulbs to customers of its Ohio utilities — Ohio Edison, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison. We will work with the PUCO to respond to its questions and determine how best to proceed.”
In a letter to Schriber sent earlier in the day, Strickland wrote, “Ohioans are confused and angry and are looking for answers. First, the bulb program has been thrust upon them without their approval or prior knowledge. Second, it is my understanding that two bulbs will be provided at a cost in excess of $21. It is common knowledge that the efficient bulbs can be purchased for significantly less at popular retail outlets. Third, I am interested to know if there are any U.S. suppliers of these bulbs, or if FirstEnergy had considered the use of bulbs manufactured in the United States.”
FirstEnergy received approval from PUCO last month to move forward with the plan, providing 3.75 million compact fluorescent light bulbs to residential customers.
Those same customers would pay about 60 cents extra on their electric bills per month for the next three years to cover the costs, according to a company release. The company says the bulbs will save customers about $60 over a five- to seven-year period.
The plan was developed to meet state-mandated energy efficiencies, with utilities required to reduce energy usage by 22.2 percent by the end of 2025.
Bulbs would be mailed or hand-delivered to First Energy’s customers.
The Ohio Consumers Counsel and the Ohio Environmental Council both say there are more effective ways to help residential customers reduce their energy usage.
Comments
"We will work with the PUCO to respond to its questions and determine how best to proceed.”
Just tossing this idea out there... STOP... people are sick of being screwed with and just want left alone.
3,750,000 energy saving bulbs @ 2 for $21.60 =1 @$10.80!!
1@$10.80 = $40,500,000 over 3 years
$.60 a month for 1,875,000 customers = $1,125,000 per month
electric business or light bulb business?
Millions of Chinese light bulbs...FE has the US foremost in their minds.
The PUCO needs shut down!! Obviously no one that makes the decisions there understand that I can go and by two of those bulbs for 6 bucks at any retail store. If you are too stupid to realize that then the only decisions PUCO should be making is whether or not to put the mustard or the ketchup on first when making me a burger at McDonalds!!!! Dumba**es!!
Last week I purchased an 8 pack of the GE energy efficient bulbs at Sams Club for $13.29. That avgs. out to $1.66 ea. First Energy can shove their light bulbs where there is no daylight.
this is one of the dumbest things i have ever heard. my wife and i live part time in ohio. the bulbs would sit there for months, providing no one steals them, before we would be back in ohio.
it will be a cold day in hell before i would pay for such stupidity.
The PUCO is nothing more than a rubber stamp for the utility industry. Another government agency that lives in fantasy land!