Youngstown News, Rich nations can’t afford not to finance war on flu
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Columbiana


Commercial
bedroom, bath
$1850000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Rich nations can’t afford not to finance war on flu


Published: Sat, July 11, 2009 @ 12:00 a.m.

Although the global flu pandemic has been pushed off the front pages by coverage of pop star Michael Jackson’s death and before that South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford’s infidelity, the spread of the novel influenza A (H1N1) virus continues at a worrisome rate. The latest data from the World Health Organization shows that 429 people have died and 94,000 have been infected in more than 70 counties.

As a result, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon is seeking at least $1 billion to help poor countries fight the flu epidemic. The money, of course, would have to come from rich nations.

It’s a tall order, given that the United States and other industrialized countries are struggling to weather the worldwide economic storm and are attempting to stimulate their own economies with huge amounts of government spending. Indeed, any suggestion that the rich should help the poor is bound to be met with vehement objection from citizens of the wealthy nations.

But, it would foolhardy for anyone to believe that the spread of the flu virus can be confined to those regions of the world most at risk. The movement of people around the world means that infections cannot be stopped.

It is noteworthy that the new swine flu virus first caused illness in Mexico and the United States in March and April. It is spread in the same way that regular seasonal influenza viruses spread, mainly through the coughs and sneezes of people who are sick with the virus. It may also be spread by touching infected objects and then touching your nose or mouth.

Mild strain

While the strain is mild and most people recover without needing treatment, it could have a more devastating impact in countries with populations fighting other health problems like AIDS, pneumonia, malaria and tuberculosis.

Hence, Secretary-General Ban’s contention that at least $1 billion is needed to ensure that poor countries get some vaccine doses and antivirals.

World Health Organization chief Margaret Chan has told potential donors that she wants to start a minimum stockpile of vaccines to 49 of the world’s least developed nations as a first step.

“Many of the developing countries have weak health systems,” Chan said. “They actually go into this pandemic what I call empty handed. They don’t have antivirals. They don’t have vaccines. They don’t have antibiotics.”

And it doesn’t matter that the rich countries like Britain and France have stockpiles of the antiviral Tamiflu, as well as orders for pandemic vaccine to cover their entire populations.

When people from rich countries travel to other countries, they are at risk — as illustrated by last week’s report that nine British students on a visit to the East African nation of Kenya were confirmed to be infected. The students, part of a group of 33, have been quarantined and receiving medication to attack the virus.

All the students have been confined to their hotel and all have been treated for swine flu.

The students were in contact with the staff of the hotel as well as pupils at various schools they visited.

The declaration of a pandemic — on June 11 the WHO raised the alert level to Phase 6 to reflect the global spread — is not to be taken lightly. Public health officials are well aware of the ease with which the virus can be transmitted, and no amount of warnings to take special care will stop the spread.

That is why the $1 billion or so would be money well spent — by the rich countries.


Comments

1Thinker(15 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

"War on Flu??" HA!

This whole swine flu thing is nothing more than an excuse for vaccine makers to get richer.

Suggest removal:

2epicfail(217 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

"This whole swine flu thing is nothing more than an excuse for vaccine makers to get richer."

What exactly are you suggesting??

Suggest removal:

3JeffLebowski(953 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

I think the poster suggests that he/she doesn't know much about immunology nor the high cost of R&D associated with vaccines.

Suggest removal:

4cambridge(2282 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

1 billion dollars. That's how much the United states spent in Iraq every 3 days for 6 1/2 years.

Suggest removal:

5OldFashionedMama(77 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

I agree with Thinker.

In fact, why don't you all think about this:

Why is it that so many people today are concerning themselves with "overpopulation" and the "environment", "how many people can this "small planet" support", etc.... Why do these same people turn around and cry about the suffering and deaths caused by naturally occuring diseases and insist "We have to do everything we can" to make sure no one dies from these things?
You can't have it both ways. You say 6 billion people is too many and put measures in place to "control the population", wasting resources and causing unnecessary and artifcial suffering in the process, when all you need to do is let nature take its course.
Spending billions to develop a vaccine for a virus that is constantly evolving and eluding makes NO sense. That money is better spent making sure those victims of AIDS and TB in Africa have enough food and clean water......

Suggest removal:

6cambridge(2282 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

OldFashionedMama....your username says it all.

Suggest removal:

7Stan(9923 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

More die in car accidents yearly than have ever died from the flu during the year . Lets ban cars and build bicycles .

Suggest removal:

8OldFashionedMama(77 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

....Not to mention immune-compromised individuals should not recieve vaccines because of an increased risk of bad side effects or even death, so why does the World Health Organization want to vaccinate people who are too sick to get the shots? Sounds like another way to eliminate the sick and reduce their own costs.......

Suggest removal:

9OldFashionedMama(77 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

I'll take that as a compliment, cambridge, even if it wasn't meant as such :-)

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: