Youngstown News, Library board OKs asking for higher additional levy
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Columbiana


Commercial
bedroom, bath
$1850000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Library board OKs asking for higher additional levy


Published: Thu, July 2, 2009 @ 12:06 a.m.

photo

Carlton A. Sears

photo

Ohio Governor Ted Strickland (D-Lisbon)

By Elise Mckeown Skolnick

The board of directors delayed action on closing the West Branch library.

YOUNGSTOWN — Anticipating budget cuts when the General Assembly passes a state budget, the board of trustees of the Public Library of Youngstown and Mahoning County will ask voters for more money than originally planned.

At its June 11 meeting, the board approved a resolution authorizing placing 1-mill replacement levy and a 0.5-mill additional levy for five years on the November ballot.

Rather than follow through with that plan, the board on Wednesday approved a resolution authorizing the 1-mill replacement levy and a 0.7-mill additional levy for five years.

“We’re looking at a cut of 30 percent [if the proposed state budget is adopted],” said Carlton Sears, director of the library system.

Gov. Ted Strickland’s proposed budget calls for a 30 percent decrease in funding to libraries. Sears doesn’t believe the decrease will be that high, but said he wouldn’t be “shocked” by a reduction of 10 percent.

A cut of that size would mean “we’re going to have to reduce hours and change the way we operate,” Sears said.

The proposed levy would raise $6.88 million annually. The levies, to be voted as one issue, need authorization from the county commissioners to be placed on the ballot. The entire process needs to be complete by Aug. 20, so the board could not wait for a state budget to pass to make its decision. The 1.5-mill levy would have generated $6.06 million a year.

The new state budget was to have been in place Wednesday, but the state Legislature approved a seven-day interim budget, allowing for more time to consider Strickland’s proposed budget. The House approved a second seven-day budget Wednesday.

“There’s a great deal of uncertainty about our biggest source of income,” Sears said.

The library system faced a $2 million deficit at the beginning of the year, due to a decrease in state funding based on tax collections. To make up the shortfall, the board made cuts in other areas, including reducing its book budget, re-negotiating its natural-gas contract and returning to 2008 salary levels for administrative staff.

On Wednesday, the board accepted reduction in wage amendments to collective-bargaining agreements with the clerical/maintenance/technical and public librarian unions. The board also laid off 10 part-time employees and deferred action on closing the West Branch library, a cost-cutting measure discussed in June.


Comments

1TAXEDOFF(118 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

I heard the news that the Library Board wants to put a new library levy on the ballot. They currently have two levies.on our tax bill.

They will be proposing a 1-mill replacement levy and a 0.5-mill additional levy for five years on the November ballot.

The replacement . levy which is a higher tax than a renewal.

You must understand the difference between a renewal and a replacement.It allows the taxing authority to get a higher value on the property tax

It also increases the limit on the levy as the current levy is set to expire The nwer one is for the newer 5 year limit is a longer term.

In essence, a replacement is a new tax generates more revenue than the old one.

The commissioners will have to approe this.of course and they will rubber stamp it as they usually do like they did on the WRTA

Another point about the Library Board is it is not elected. It is appointed by the library administration. In turn it determines the pay of the Library employes

The library now wants the taxpayers to pay for their poor strategic planning

They built a library system for a shrinking population

They built huge expensive to maintain libraries in Poland, South Side and Austintown

If we only had forward thinking people with cooperation in mind. The Austintown library
and school could have ben combined,

They have libraries .2 miles away from each other

The commissioners will also have a tax levy on the Nov. ballot

They will want to have their expireing .5 percent on as a continous tax for all practical purposes, that means permanent

Taxpayers should say NO to all three

It's all in the wording continuous replacement, permanent

The battle cry should be I'M TAXED OFF

Suggest removal:

2UnionForever(1452 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

NO - we don't need no libraries with the internet available. NO NO NO new levy.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: