- ADVERTISEMENT -
 

« Opinion

Will high-speed trains zip by Mahoning Valley?

Published: Tue, February 24, 2009 @ 12:00 a.m.

There’s a lot of talks these days in Columbus and Washington about trains, but the Mahoning Valley isn’t part of the conversation in the governor’s office or the White House. Why? That’s what William DeCicco, executive director of the CASTLO Community Improvement Corporation, and others want to find out.

And, they aren’t going to be impressed with explanations that attempt to justify the exclusion of Youngstown and Warren.

“I have no problem with eventually constructing a high speed rail link [from Cleveland] to Columbus and Cincinnati ... but only after a northern Ohio route is built. Let the battle begin.” So wrote DeCicco in a widely circulated e-mail to politicians, development specialists and community leaders. “It is time to start uniting our brother and sister development organizations in Toledo, Sandusky, Lorain, Elyria, Cleveland and Akron along with those of us in the Mahoning Valley to make a high speed rail route through our region a reality.”

DeCicco and others are reacting to Gov. Ted Strickland’s discussion in his State of the State address Jan. 28 about the creation of passenger rail service in the 3C Corridor — Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati.

“Our goal is to link Ohio’s three largest cities by passenger rail service for the first time in 40 years,” the governor said. “This will be the first step toward a rail system that links neighborhoods within a city, and cities within our state.”

But the head of CASTLO is justified in his skepticism of anything developing after the CCC link is completed and in operation.

Federal stimulus money

If that announcement wasn’t enough to trigger a declaration of war, the $787 billion federal economic stimulus package passed by the Democratic Congress and signed into law by Democratic President Barack Obama contains $8 billion for the development of high-speed passenger rail service. Although specific routes for the service have not been mapped out, there is a report in Politico, a political news web site, that much of the $8 billion was added in the final bargaining on the bill on Capitol with White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. It is not hard to imagine that Emanuel’s being from Chicago could result in the development of a high-speed rail connection from the Windy City to Washington, D.C., and the East Coast.

Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur, D-Sandusky, a member of the powerful House appropriations committee and its transportation subcommittee, is already making a pitch for some of the stimulus money to be used to develop high-speed passenger rail service connecting Chicago, Toledo, Sandusky, Cleveland and Pittsburgh.

The Mahoning Valley deserves to be a stop on that route.

Indeed, this region has been without passenger rail service since 2005, when Amtrak shut down its Three Rivers line that ran between Chicago and New York City.

Akron and Fostoria also lost service.

On the other hand, Sandusky is served by two Amtrak trains, the Capitol Limited, which links Washington to Chicago, and the Lake Shore Limited, linking Chicago to Boston and New York.

Congressman Tim Ryan of Niles, D-17th, also serves on the Appropriations Committee, and is viewed as one of the rising stars in the House. We have every confidence that Ryan will be heard when plans are being developed for spending the $8 billion.

On the other hand, Gov. Strickland’s proposal for the 3C rail corridor — the trains would not be high-speed — must be viewed as another threat to the development of the Mahoning Valley. After all, Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati have benefited substantially — more than is justified — from taxpayer dollars flowing out of state coffers.

That has given the Three Cs an advantage over regions like ours.

We deserve to be heard.


Comments

1 JanKo (10 comments)posted 9 months, 1 day ago

In a document posted February 19th on the website of the Ohio Rail Development Commission to state legislature:

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Rai...

"Concurrently, ORDC is working toward conventional speed service (up to a maximum of 79
mph) in the 3-C Corridor as a first step toward a larger system.

We are working with Amtrak to determine the requirements for start-up service between Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, and Cincinnati. The results of Amtrak’s work are expected late this summer, and ODOT has committed to funding the first phase of the service in this biennium."

Suggest removal:

2 cityguy (109 comments)posted 9 months, 1 day ago

I just wrote to the Governor to voice my opinion. It's easy to do via email on his website and I would encourage everyone to do the same. We have to make our voices heard and make it understood that this area has been abandoned by our state leaders for almost 40 years now and we are no longer willing to sit quietly.

Suggest removal:

3 Erplane (313 comments)posted 9 months, 1 day ago

Low-speed rail b/t the three Cs doesnt make any sense. People would still fly b/y Cleveland and Cincy given the time it would take by rail. High speed rail b/t Cleve Ytown and Pitts at least addresses a greater population density than the 3Cs, but it must come in connection with better light rail and public transportation within the cities for it to be a workable idea.

Suggest removal:

4Read blog paulydel (520 comments)posted 9 months ago

We should updated the rail system years ago. If it was set up properly you could ride to work on the train and not be burning up the roads or worrying about traffic. You should be able to be within a couple of blocks of where you work. They need to start bulding now.

Suggest removal:

Requires free registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


News
Opinion
Sports News
Entertainment News
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Submission Forms

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseContact
© 2009 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Sponsored Links: