Youngstown News, Is Westminster promoting doggie defects?
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 2 bath
$80000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Is Westminster promoting doggie defects?


Published: Tue, February 10, 2009 @ 12:00 a.m.

By ALISA MULLINS

This week, the dog world’s biggest shindig, the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show, will descend on New York City with much fanfare and fur-primping. Parts of the show will be broadcast live on TV, but I won’t be watching, even though I love dogs. Actually, I won’t be watching because I love dogs.

Westminster and other dog shows are simply overblown beauty pageants. I know because I’ve been to dog shows — many of them. I’ve lost count of the shows I was trundled off to when my dad was showing our family’s Great Pyrenees in obedience trials. She earned her Companion Dog certification and won a big silver bowl that our cat liked to sleep in. As a young adult, I entered dogs in a couple of conformation shows myself, but I quickly became disenchanted by the intense seriousness with which people took these shows, which I, in my naivete, thought should be fun.

If there’s anything more zealous than an ex-smoker, I suppose it might be an expurebred dog fancier. Looking back, I can’t believe I was so obsessed with having a certain type of dog — to the point that I would go to dog shows and talk with breeders for hours on end. I was a “well-educated” dog buyer — I knew better than to go to a pet shop, which even 30 years ago were notorious for being fronts for puppy mills — but I wasn’t educated enough to know not to buy from any breeder at all.

Hip dysplasia

All the purebred dogs I’ve had — and I’m ashamed to say there have been many — came from so-called “reputable” breeders (one even shows dogs at Westminster), and all the dogs had serious health or behavioral problems. Our Great Pyrenees had crippling hip dysplasia that eventually killed her. Our borzois all had serious aggression problems, mostly toward other dogs, but one had to be euthanized after he tried to remove the babysitter’s face. Our sweet, gentle Irish wolfhound died at age 7 from cardiomyopathy, a common ailment in wolfhounds and other large breeds.

In fact, it is estimated that one in four purebred dogs is afflicted with serious congenital defects. Labrador retrievers — America’s most popular dog — are prone to bone disease, hemophilia and retinal degeneration, and nearly 60 percent of golden retrievers suffer from hip dysplasia. A recent British TV documentary on the issue caused an uproar when it revealed that even top prize-winning dogs were found to be suffering from life-threatening inherited diseases.

The ensuing public outcry spurred the BBC to stop airing the Crufts dog show, which is the British equivalent of Westminster. Public pressure has even caused the Kennel Club (the AKC’s British counterpart) to issue new breed standards in an attempt to stop “encouraging features that might prevent a dog breathing, walking and seeing freely.” For example, the standard for bulldogs will no longer call for overly large heads, short, bowed legs and flattened faces.

Status symbols

Inspired by the BBC’s example, PETA is calling on USA Network to stop airing Westminster. Westminster may seem like good, clean family fun, but in reality, its message is that dogs are status symbols to be dressed up and shown off. It promotes deformed, inbred dogs who will break their guardians’ hearts — and their bank accounts — when they develop one of the dozens of inherited diseases that even the most popular breeds are afflicted with.

I’ve learned my lesson — my current dog is a shaggy mutt who was rescued from an animal shelter. There’s no guarantee that he won’t eventually develop a serious disease, but, just as with people, a bigger gene pool lowers the risk of inheriting a fatal defect. So far, his only defect is a pair of big, expressive brown eyes that all too often succeed in conning me out of my last bite of burrito.

X Alisa Mullins is a senior writer for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Norfolk, Va. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.


Comments

1GSD(22 comments)posted 3 years ago

Hey Alisa, what's your answer to this?
http://petakillsanimals.com/pressRele...

CENTER FOR CONSUMER FREEDOM FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT- Tim Miller, 202-463-7112 May 7, 2008
Government Records Show PETA Killed over 90 Percent of "Companion Animals" in 2007 Animal "Rights" Group's Pet Death Toll Up To 19,200

WASHINGTON, DC¬ An official report filed by People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) with the Virginia government shows that the organization put to death more than 90 percent of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption during 2007. During that year, the well-known animal rights group managed to find adoptive homes for just 17 animals. In light of PETA's hypocritical angel-of-death program, today the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) called on PETA to stop its routine condemnation of Americans who believe it’s perfectly ethical to use animals for food, clothing, and medical research.

This comes on the heels of last week’s Newsweek report (http://www.newsweek.com/id/134549), which revealed that since 1998 PETA had killed, “more than 17,000 animals, nearly 85 percent of all those it has rescued.”

Not counting animals PETA held only temporarily in its spay-neuter program, the organization took in 1,997 "companion animals" during 2007, of which it killed 1,815. According to Virginia’s Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS), the average euthanasia rate for humane societies in the state was just 36.2 percent in 2007. PETA killed 90.9 percent of the animals it took in.

"Pet lovers should be outraged," said CCF Director of Research David Martosko. "There are thousands of worthwhile animal-welfare organizations that deserve the support of compassionate Americans. PETA is not one of them. This is the kind of cold, heartless behavior that would draw a naked PETA protest if anyone else were doing it."

Suggest removal:

2GSD(22 comments)posted 3 years ago

The article continues:
In courtroom testimony last year, a PETA manager acknowledged that her organization maintains a large walk-in freezer for storing dead animals, and that PETA contracts with a Virginia cremation service to dispose of the bodies. In that trial, PETA employees described some of the animals they acknowledged killing as "adorable," "perfect," and "pregnant."
In January, CCF petitioned VDACS to consider officially reclassifying PETA as a "slaughterhouse" instead of a "humane society" and an animal "releasing agency." VDACS Commissioner Todd Haymore responded in a January 25, 2008 letter that while PETA's rate of killing animals is "extremely high," the state's laws "do not provide the authority for [VDACS] to 'strip' PETA of its designation as a 'humane society' or 'releasing agency.'"
"It's horribly ironic that PETA kills so many animals" Martosko added. "PETA raised over $30 million last year, and it’s using that money to kill the only flesh-and-blood animals its employees actually see. The scale of PETA’s hypocrisy is simply staggering." For more information or to schedule an interview contact Tim Miller at 202-463-7112. Learn more about PETA’s hypocrisy at www.petakillsanimals.com

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: