Probate court gets an extra $200,000
By PETER H. MILLIKEN
VINDICATOR STAFF WRITER
YOUNGSTOWN — Judge Mark A. Belinky of Mahoning County Probate Court has canceled the layoffs of 13 of his 17 staffers, which had been set for Sept. 19, and said court operations will not be curtailed now that the commissioners have added $200,000 to his general-fund budget this year.
After a 10-minute executive session, the commissioners voted 2-1 Thursday, with Commissioner John A. McNally IV casting the dissenting vote, to transfer $200,000 from their general-fund administration category to the probate court to bring the probate court’s general-fund budget to $894,833 for this year.
The commissioners earlier had allocated $694,833 from the general fund to the probate court for this year.
The judge then filed a mandamus lawsuit in the 7th District Court of Appeals to enforce his demand for the $915,715 he said was necessary for proper operation of his court.
The judge said Thursday the extra $200,000 allocation has settled that lawsuit and that he’ll make up for the $20,882 shortfall by deferring office-equipment purchases. “We’ll do without it because we understand the county is having financial difficulties,” the judge said.
Commissioner David N. Ludt said he voted for the settlement because probate-court layoffs would be devastating to those served by the court and because of the high cost of litigation and the possibility that the appellate court might order the commissioners to provide the full $915,715.
“Why make an attorney rich for a dispute that we should be settling?” he asked. “I think it’s prudent for the county to settle it, and that’s why I did it. The higher courts usually rule for the judges.”
“To carry this fight, which more than likely would have required litigation all the way to the [Ohio] Supreme Court, may have cost an additional $100,000 in legal fees,” said county Administrator George J. Tablack. When they approved hiring lawyers for each side at county expense, the commissioners capped legal fees at $10,000 for each side.
“I thought that the litigation should have proceeded so a court could determine whether the judge’s actions are reasonable,” McNally said, explaining his dissenting vote.
“The commissioners just capitulating like this sends a message, quite frankly, to the other courts that you should get what you asked for,” he said. “None of the courts got what they originally asked for. They all took severe cuts” in their budgets for this year, McNally noted.
The settlement gives the probate court a general-fund budget lower than the $922,000 it had six years ago, Judge Belinky said, adding that his court operates in a fiscally responsible manner.
He added his court has a smaller budget and fewer employees than probate courts in similarly sized counties, even though his court’s caseload is larger than that of the other probate courts.
“He needs to start [making cuts] at the beginning of the year so he doesn’t have to wait until the end of the year to lay everybody off,” Ludt said of Judge Belinky.
When asked why he didn’t institute unpaid floating holidays for his staff earlier this year as other county departments had done, Judge Belinky said, “We can’t operate that way.”
“We announced the layoffs because we are simply running out of money, and I just thought it was better to keep the staff intact. I thought we could serve the public better” by doing so, he said, adding that he had hoped the dispute would be resolved before Sept. 19.
For example, he said handling an emergency hospitalization for a mentally ill person would be difficult if a specialist in mental-health hearings was taking an unpaid day off on the day that matter needed attention.
The probate court has spent $536,613 from the general fund so far this year, of which $509,469 went for salaries and benefits and the rest for office-operating expenses, according to figures the court released Thursday.
milliken@vindy.com
Other business
The Mahoning County commissioners also handled these matters at their Thursday meeting:
Approved the transfer of attorney Kevin M. Kralj from assistant county prosecutor to acting human resources administrator at the Department of Job and Family Services.
Approved the closing of Gault Road between Palmyra and Kirk roads in Ellsworth and Jackson Townships from this past Monday until Oct. 8 for replacement of three culverts, each 10 feet in diameter and 80 feet long. Traffic is being detoured along Palmyra Road, state Route 45 and Kirk Road.
Voted to advertise for bids for demolition of 12 structures in Campbell using federal neighborhood stabilization money.
Comments
The use of "caves" in this headline is unprofessional.
I have no opinion one way or the other about this dispute. Vindy reporters and others have followed this story and have gathered facts, statements, and other evidence. Fine. That's what you are supposed to do.
But the conclusion that a group or agency has "caved" belongs on the editorial page, not in a news headline.
It's the truth. What is wrong with printing the truth?
The audacity, arrogance, and inept management of Mr. Belinky are astounding. I no longer have the words to describe my disgust.
I am extremely disappointed in the decision of the commissioners to cave-in (a very appropriate term) to his ridiculous demands. Regardless of the practicality, the precedent being set is a disaster. Sometimes it is necessary to stand fast and fight stupidity, and this was one of those times.
Unfortunately, we are stuck with Mr. Belinky for another 5 years. I wonder how much money he will demand from us next year.
Judge Belinky does an amazing job running the Probate Court. His court is one of the most efficient in the state. He has operated with the budget limitations imposed to punish his predecessor, but there is a limit on how many cases that a reduced staff can handle. The county is obligated to fund the court operations, if they shut the Probate Court down, they loose the revenue and estate taxes collected by the Probate Court.
The reality of the economic situation is the reality of the economic situation. The funding reduction the Commissioners offered was a 10% reduction from last year, which is highly reasonable given the circumstances. I wish my funding (personal & professional) had only been cut back by 10%. This was a time to be a leader and figure out how to make it work with less, and instead Belinky sniveled and whined and held his breath until he got his way.
Per the report “When asked why he didn’t institute unpaid floating holidays for his staff earlier this year as other county departments had done, Judge Belinky said, ‘We can’t operate that way.” Given that response, I suggest we get new people who can figure out how to operate that way. I certainly had to this last year.
His example about handling an emergency hospitalization for a mentally ill person being difficult if a specialist in mental-health hearings was taking an unpaid day off on the day that matter needed attention is absurd. Has he never heard of a cell phone? Put your specialist in mental-health hearings on call. If a problem arises while they are scheduled off, call them in to work and reschedule their day off. If your mental-health specialist won’t do that, get a new mental-health specialist.
The people I manage and I (and everyone else at my employer) have been working that way, with far more harshly reduced pay and hours than Belinky and his people would have had to endure. We, however, are professionals and realize that there is a job to do, customers to serve, and we have to deal with it. We work extra hours when we are there with no OT, cover for one another, and reschedule our unpaid time off as necessary to service the customers and keep the business running.
Belinky will get no sympathy from me, and will never get my vote.