|
Welcome,
| |
|
| |

Youngstown Mayor Jay Williams
Officials also are discussing a settlement with a firefighter over residency outside the city.
YOUNGSTOWN — A police officer fired in 2006 for violating the city’s residency law would receive $70,000 in back pay and damages from Youngstown in a settlement being proposed by the administration.
City council will vote on the recommendation at a special meeting Wednesday afternoon to authorize the board of control to make the payment to Patrolman Daniel Tickerhoof.
As part of the deal, Tickerhoof would quit the police department, Mayor Jay Williams said.
Tickerhoof earned about $50,000 annually in base pay as a Youngstown officer.
In addition to the $70,000, Tickerhoof would receive about $1,500 for unused sick and vacation time in severance pay from the city, Williams said.
Tickerhoof would not be replaced if the board of control approves the settlement.
The city fired Tickerhoof in September 2006 because he moved from Youngstown to Canal Fulton in Summit County.
Tickerhoof moved after the state Legislature voted in June 2006 to overturn residency requirement laws in cities, villages and counties in Ohio for their workers as a condition of employment.
The Youngstown administration fired Tickerhoof and Firefighter Joseph Wren, who moved to Poland. City administrators said the two violated the city’s residency law that required all city employees hired since 1986 to live in Youngstown.
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled two months ago that the state law was constitutional and didn’t violate cities’ home-rule authority.
Youngstown was forced to rehire Tickerhoof and Wren in July.
In a November 2006 federal lawsuit, Tickerhoof sued the city for $100,000, but agreed to dismiss the case in May 2007 and wait for the state Supreme Court’s decision.
After being fired, Tickerhoof worked for the Canal Fulton Police Department.
While Tickerhoff returned to the Youngstown force last month, he is expected to work for the Canal Fulton department after the settlement is approved.
The automated telephone system at the Canal Fulton Police Department includes an option to leave a voice mail for Tickerhoof. Messages left late Monday afternoon by The Vindicator for Tickerhoof and Canal Fulton Police Chief David Frisone on their department voice mails weren’t returned.
Wren is discussing a financial settlement with the city’s law department, said Williams and Fire Chief John O’Neill.
Wren, paid about $50,000 a year in base pay as a firefighter, had fought his firing through arbitration.
An arbitrator ruled in the summer of 2007 that he was in no position to make a decision because the matter was being considered by the Ohio Supreme Court.
Wren didn’t return messages left Monday by the newspaper.
skolnick@vindy.com
Comments
The cities need to pay for unreasonably trying to force their workers to live in a ghetto area. The days of claiming that a particular neighborhood is "good for city workers" is over. Now everyone can live where they want to and can afford to. Let the elected officials remain stuck in the traps they created.
A few minutes ago I read a comment that said that the city has plenty of good pulic schools? But now the city is trying to force people to live in a ghetto?
Poor conditions in the city are a result of concentrated poverty caused by the movement of the middle class into the suburbs. The reasons for residency requirements were not as much to be good for city workers as to be good for the city's neighborhoods. I live in Youngstown and am very familiar with all of the neighborhoods here and although there are many sections I would agree can be classified as ghettos condemning the whole city is misinforming the reader. Also, I would venture to say that most city employees still reside in the city and have no plans on moving out.
The city does NOT have "plenty of good pulic [sic] schools" but it does have some areas that are pretty ghetto-like.
Be all that as it may, the city overstepped its authority when it fired these two employees, and it kept pushing and pushing, despite having the state law upheld at every turn along the way. The city played the role of the heavy-handed, "my way or the highway" uncompromising authority, when any rational thinker would have held off on actually firing anybody until the appellate process worked itself out.
I think the two employees should not only go after the city, but Williams and the city council personally, as well.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)