facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Dear John: Your pick of Palin is unlike you



Published: Sun, September 21, 2008 @ 12:00 a.m.

By Bertram de Souza (Contact)


By Bertram de Souza

When Democrats threw political caution to the wind and nominated Barack Obama, a first term U.S. senator, for president, one non-aligned voter said to himself, “Let’s see what John McCain has to offer.” McCain had early on secured the Republican Party nomination and the only question unanswered in the months leading up to the GOP national convention had to do with his choice of running mate.

The veteran U.S. senator from Arizona had a list that included Tom Ridge, former head of Homeland Security, former governor of Pennsylvania and former congressman from Erie; Mitt Romney, former governor Massachusetts, former CEO of the 2002 Winter Olympics and a successful businessman; Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat-turned-independent, who shares McCain’s passion for the war in Iraq; and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

Who McCain picked would define him in his bid for the presidency, the swing voter thought. In Congress, he’s known as a maverick, as someone willing to buck his party and unwilling to kowtow to ideological special interests. The selection process for running mate was followed closely.

Obama’s victory over U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, the former first lady who championed the cause of women and children not only in this country but around the world and who led the fight for affordable health care for all Americans, was puzzling, given his r sum . There also was the issue of his having a black father from East Africa and a white mother from Kansas.

Such hurdles to his developing a broad-based, bipartisan coalition of voters for the general election were discussed in detail in this space several times, starting late last year.

Foreign policy

Of particular concern was Obama’s lack of foreign policy experience compared with some of the other contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Republicans, led by McCain, jumped on the fact that the Democratic Party’s standard bearer not only had a thin r sum , but lacked a deep understanding of foreign affairs.

How did Obama, a former state legislator from Illinois, react? By picking as his vice presidential running mate veteran Sen. Joe Biden, who twice sought the Democratic nomination for president.

Biden, chairman of the Foreign Relations committee, is recognized by foreign policy experts as one of most knowledgeable members of Congress when it comes to America’s role and standing in the world.

How would McCain counter? Just before the GOP convention, he introduced Sarah Palin, an obscure governor from a faraway state.

Palin’s r sum is even thinner than Obama’s. She has been governor of Alaska less than 20 months, while he has been in the U.S. Senate three years and before that was a state legislator.

But to this non-aligned voter, here’s the most telling comparison between the Democratic and Republican tickets: Biden can bolster Obama’s knowledge of the pressing issues of the day; Palin can’t help McCain in any substantive way. Her role on the ticket is ideological.

McCain has said that the economy is not his strong suit. His vice presidential running mate certainly can’t help him there.

Given that admitted shortcoming, why didn’t McCain select Romney, the former governor of a major state and a highly successful businessman? Because Romney is a Mormon and many right-wingers in the Republican Party, especially the Bible thumpers, view Mormonism as a cult, rather than a Christian religion.

Why not Ridge, who has vast Washington and state government experience? Because he is pro-choice on the issue of abortion, even though he personally is opposed.

Right-wing threat

McCain’s selection of Palin was a genuflection before the evangelicals, many of whom had threatened to stay home election day because they weren’t sold on his conservative credentials. With Palin on the ticket, the three Gs — God, Guns and Gays — are in play. And, she is stridently opposed to abortion.

As Wall Street burns, the Dobsons of the world hold prayer sessions to change the evil ways of homosexuals. These are the people hailing Palin’s presence on the Republican ticket.

Dear John: You put political expediency before principle — and this non-aligned voter in a quandary.


Comments

1Shelby(1 comment)posted 5 years, 9 months ago

"Dear John: You put political expediency before principle — and this non-aligned voter in a quandary."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My feelings precisely! Mitt Romney, the most qualified of all the candidates on either side this election, should have been the Repub nominee! Or at LEAST the VP! It's all about the economy, this year and this should have been a no-brainer!

McCain, you really screwed up!!!

Suggest removal:

2DS(1 comment)posted 5 years, 9 months ago

By picking Palin, John McCain put country last. All she does is appeal to party loyalists who would vote Republican no matter how awful the candidates were. This Republican has pulled up the ladder. We've got two guys running for president, but just one of them admits he's a democrat. I say that and it doesn't come across the right way after writing it. I mean, I'm not some one note partisan. What I dislike about Bush's Presidency isn't what all the deranged Bush Bashers hyperfreakout about, but it's just that he only used the veto twice. In my view that's a poor executive and I probably conclude he didn't use it much in his whole New Tone effort to unify or at least pacify congressional Democrats, which failed immensely. Well, guess what, much of all that bad legislation Bush signed into law was written by McCain. Now if I'm lukewarm about Bush, then it's a far stretch to get me to vote for McCain. I'm rambling but I think the way to summarize my refusal to vote in this election is that I think it fair to say the neocons have trivialized the tenets of the Republican party in the same way liberals have the democrat party. That is, neocons are constantly trying to defend their theory as absolute that government is never the answer in the same way liberals spend their souls trying to prove that government is always the best solution. Meanwhile--as the rhetoric between the two parties has grown exact opposites--the actions of both parties have grown only closer, ironically. Anyway, my mindset this election was whichever candidate could display a pragmatic grasp on how to solve problems would get my vote. The horrible events between the McCain Lie and the Huckabee Bigotry provided a perfect storm to keep Mitt Romney down, and so now I'm the maverick to my very own Republican Party, setting out to influence my peers not to vote this year, or write-in Romney, maybe Reagan if too young to cast a ballot in his day, or even to vote Obama if it looks like McCain is close in the race. I've been saying Mark Twain couldn't fictionalize a more perfect character than Mitt Romney to handle the challenges we face today, and well so I'm more than willing to wait 4 years for him rather to watch John McCain's ghoulish grin on TV every night, as he moves the Reps only closer to the Dems, which, regardless of anyone's political persuasion, isn't good for any of us when both parties mirror each other. Besides Republicans not deserving to win (war mess, financial mess, political scandals, Supreme Court that we put 7 of 9 justices on stripping our property rights down and granted constitutional rights to terrorists), what the hell would we miss if John McCain doesn't get to be President?

Suggest removal:

3Woody(451 comments)posted 5 years, 9 months ago

DS,

I am troubled by something you said, "granting constitutional rights to terrorists."

How in the world is this Bush's fault?

I know the libs like to blame everything on Bush. But this is a stretch. He fought giving the Gitmo terrorists US Citizens' rights. His two appointees: Alito and Roberts both voted against the ruling. As did Scalia and Thomas, Reagan appointees.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport