facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

McCain’s pick of Palin cost him a vote



Published: Sun, November 2, 2008 @ 12:00 a.m.

By Bertram de Souza (Contact)


By Bertram de Souza

If only the John McCain on the presidential campaign trail had been the John McCain in the United States Senate. If only. But when the veteran Republican senator from Arizona made winning at all costs his reason to be, as evidenced by major shifts in his positions on important issues, he gave up the right to the maverick moniker earned in Congress.

After the Democratic and Republican primaries, this non-aligned voter was looking for compelling reasons to support one nominee over the other.

Democrat Barack Obama, a three-year U.S. senator from Illinois, scored a surprising victory in a primary that featured a strong field of candidates led by U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, the former first lady. Before the March contest in Ohio, it was argued in this space that Clinton’s experience, knowledge, political standing with traditional Democratic voters and the popularity of her husband, former President Bill Clinton, made her the preferred choice.

Indeed, Clinton scored a decisive victory in the battleground state of Ohio and crushed Obama in Mahoning and Trumbull counties. She also carried the big states, including California and New York. But Obama’s national campaign for delegates turned out to be a winner.

Likewise, McCain proved the experts wrong when he rode his campaign as a political moderate to victory.

Strengths, weaknesses

And so, post primary became a time of weighing the strengths and weaknesses of each nominee. Obama’s r sum compared with McCain’s gave the Republican the edge with this writer.

But as the general election campaign unfolded, McCain the GOP standard bearer began to move away from Mc-Cain the Senate maverick.

First, he abandoned Ohio Sen. George V. Voinovich, his brother-in-arms in the battle for a balanced federal budget, when he embraced President Bush’s tax cuts; he went so far as to say they should be extended. That was a major departure from his original position, shared by Voinovich: Any reduction in taxes must be matched by deep cuts in the federal budget or an infusion of new money. Neither has occurred and the deficit has exploded.

McCain obviously thought it was more important to appease Republicans who viewed him with suspicion than to stand on principle.

Second, there was his highly controversial position on immigration. Again, he was at odds with the extreme wing of the party because of his contention that the 12 million undocumented aliens should be given a chance to earn their citizenship, rather than being deported. But as his general election campaign took flight, the Arizona senator stopped talking about citizenship.

Third, there was his kowtowing to the religious wing of the GOP. In 2000, McCain told evangelical leaders that their moralizing was divisive. But today, he has embraced all their extremist views.

But the most telling example of McCain’s win-at-all-costs position was his selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his vice presidential running mate. Palin is the darling of the extreme right of the party and is much more strident on such wedge issues as abortion than McCain. Yet, he picked her — because he realized that not doing the bidding of the Rev. Dobsons of the world would be detrimental to his campaign.

Palin’s selection was not only an insult to all thinking voters, but did nothing to fill in the blank in McCain’s profile: His admitted lack of expertise on the economy. He could have chosen someone with a strong business background, such as Mitt Romney, or Tom Ridge, who has vast experience with the federal government, both in the executive and legislative branches. Romney and Ridge are former governors.

By contrast, Obama has remained consistent in his core beliefs and in his biggest test in the general election campaign, the selection of a vice presidential running mate, he scored a hundred.

Foreign policy

The Democratic nominee, aware that his foreign policy credentials were not his strong suit, tapped U.S. Sen. Joe Biden, chairman of the foreign relations committee and one of the most knowledgeable members of Congress on foreign affairs.

Obama has run an exceptional campaign, his message has resonated and he has the one ingredient every politician must have to be successful: luck. The collapse of the national and global economies has served to overshadow the trepidation many white voters have about his being black.

McCain could have had this writer’s vote. He blew it.


Comments

1valleyred(1097 comments)posted 5 years, 10 months ago

Sarah Palin will win him the election. There was no way in hell McCain would've won without his base behind him and you folks all know it.

Bush won in the last 72 hours because of mobilized evangelicals [which love palin.] If they go out in these final 72 hours and do what they did in 2004, we got the White House for 4 more years!

The mobilized McCaniacs probably would have stayed home these final 72 hours, but because of Palin, they are back on board!

Suggest removal:

2TheLostPatrol(756 comments)posted 5 years, 10 months ago

You're wrong on this one Bertram. Sarah Palin WAS my deciding factor to vote for McCain. Bottom Line...she's not a Washington Beltway Gaffer. So she doesn't have 10+ years in Congress, but she's as close to my standard of living that a President or Vice President has ever been in my lifetime. For that, McCain gets my vote.

Suggest removal:

3Brian215(13 comments)posted 5 years, 10 months ago

If you weren't going to vote for McCain because of Palin then you were never going to vote for McCain. Barack Hussein Obama is a total fraud. If you had seriously considered your vote you would have researched both candidates. Even a shallow investigation into Obama's background is enough to show he campaigned on lies. There are no actions in his past to support any of the positions he staked out. He has truly been far left in his writings and actions since first moving into politics. You may want a reason for voting for Obama but like most who did cast their vote for him, it is unexplainable. The Mahoning Valley again obeyed its masters at the DNC and will continue to be repayed with neglect. You've done your readers, your country and yourself a disservice.

Suggest removal:

4JeffLebowski(953 comments)posted 5 years, 10 months ago

The grapes, they are sour.

Suggest removal:

5tnmartin(233 comments)posted 5 years, 10 months ago

Bologna. Stuff and nonsense and other similar comments.
First of all, I doubt seriously that ANY Republican would do well in the Valley. We all know the truth, that Satan himself, complete with horns, tail, and pitchfork, would get a majority of the votes so long as he was an endorsed Democrat. Truth be told, some pretty lousy candidates - think Jimmy Carter, Al Bore, or John Kerry, for example - got support here for no better reason than that. So let's not pretend that McCain had any chance here whatever. It's simply not true. Admit it. Time to wake up and to realize that the inbred psychopathologies of the Mahoning Valley are not indicative of the nation as a whole, but more like those of Bulgaria or East Germany under the boot of the Red Army.
Second, McCain was a lousy candidate. Most Republicans, those outside the Beltway at least, knew it all along, and did not support him in the primaries. He was, and is, the Republican most liked by Democrats. Given a choice between a 'real' Democrat, and a Democrat-lite like McCain, voters chose the Real Thing.
Finally, Governor Palin did not cost McCain the election. It is at best ridiculous to say so. The reality is that the good Governor is the *only* reason the ticket got as many votes as it did, many pubbies were seriously considering voting 3rd party of sitting home, until her name was put forward. The fact that the nation had the prospect of a non-lawyer, non-Beltway-insider, on a national ticket was the ONLY thing that got the pubbies the votes that they did. Otherwise, the R's deserved, again, the title of ''Stupid Party''.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport