- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Columbiana


Commercial
bedroom, bath
$1850000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

State debates changes to Dominion East bills


Published: Tue, June 24, 2008 @ 12:00 a.m.

By Don Shilling

The Ohio Consumers’ Counsel objects to a change in Dominion’s billing structure.

Changes to the distribution part of the Dominion East Ohio’s bills are being debated by state regulators.

The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio has proposed moving most distribution costs from a usage-based system to a flat fee. The Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, which represents residential utility customers in rate cases, filed an objection to the proposal Monday.

Dominion customers in Northeast Ohio now pay $5.70 a month to cover administrative costs, such as billing and meter reading. They also pay a distribution fee that covers the cost of delivering gas. It varies by usage.

Together, these two charges make up about 25 percent of a customer’s bill. The rest covers the cost of buying gas.

The PUCO staff has recommended that the administrative fee and most of the distribution costs be wrapped into one flat fee of $17.50 a month, although there still would be a small variable fee for distribution. The variable part of the bill would fall from $1.24 per thousand cubic feet of gas to 36 cents per thousand cubic feet.

Matt Butler, a PUCO spokesman, said he didn’t have figures on what this would mean to an average customer. In a recent case with Duke Energy in Cincinnati, similar changes resulted in a $4 a month increase, he said.

Public hearings will be held on the Dominion case. The PUCO is expected to decide the case in the fall.

Butler said the PUCO staff thinks high-volume users should not pay more for distribution than low-volume users because the costs of installing and maintaining natural gas lines is the same for both customers.

The Ohio Consumers’ Counsel said the change would be unfair because customers who conserve and lower their usage would be paying the same for distribution as higher-volume users.

Neil Durbin, a Dominion spokesman, said the utility didn’t want to comment on the objection and is willing to work through the hearing process with the PUCO.

shilling@vindy.com


Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: