|
Welcome,
| |
|
| |

The investigation should take two weeks, the mayor said.
GIRARD — Police Chief Frank Bigowsky has been placed on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation — a probe that no one will speak about.
Bigowsky had been on sick leave because of an injury to his foot, but returned to work Monday morning. He was given notice of the administrative leave during a mandatory daily meeting with Mayor James Melfi and Safety Service Director Jerry Lambert.
“As of this date, June 9, 2008, 9:15 a.m., you are hereby placed on paid administrative leave of your duties of chief of the Girard Police Department until an internal investigation is complete. At this time, all building and office keys, automobile keys, automobiles and your cell phone are to be turned in to Service Director Jerry Lambert,” the brief letter reads.
The decision to place Bigowsky on paid leave comes after a lengthy interview session in Lambert’s office last week.
The meeting, which began just after 10 a.m. Friday, lasted more than four hours behind closed doors. Bigowsky arrived for the meeting, accompanied by Atty. Joseph Kondela. Neither Bigowsky nor his attorney would comment on the proceedings at that time.
Kondela could not be reached for comment Monday afternoon. Bigowsky, reached Monday evening, said he could not comment on the administrative leave.
Melfi said the investigation into Bigowsky should take about two weeks to complete. Other than that, the mayor is being tight-lipped about what is being investigated.
“We are not going to say a lot about this until the investigation is complete,” he said.
Lambert also is keeping the reasons for the investigation secret, but did say the outcome could lead to the termination of Bigowsky or any range of disciplinary action. “At this point, anything is possible,” he said.
Melfi said the administration is reviewing who will lead the police department over the next few weeks while a decision about Bigowsky is being made, but Lambert will oversee daily operations in the meantime.
Bigowsky and Melfi have had several recent public disagreements.
Bigowsky recently sent a letter to the civil service commission detailing a meeting among himself, Melfi, police Capt. Jeffrey Palmer and Lambert after a disagreement over the hiring of a police officer. In the letter, Bigowsky said the mayor was threatening, demeaning and irate during a mid-April meeting.
Melfi said the letter contained information that was not true.
Melfi also said Bigowsky failed to attend mandatory morning meetings in his office. Bigowsky, however, at the time said he was on light duty per a doctor’s order and in the office only a few hours each day.
The April exchange was not the first time Melfi and Bigowsky opposed each other. The two officials have bumped heads over police department funding, buying police cars, pay raises and department staffing levels.
Later in the evening council approved pay raise provisions for the police and fire chief’s positions. Council had been debating the pay raise issue for months and Monday decided to approve pay raises for the chiefs’ after they are given evaluations.
The pay raises will be up to four percent. Councilmen Brian Kren and Joe Shelby disagreed with the pay raises saying they would be enough to bring the pay of the chiefs above the rate of a captain — something they say needs to be done.
jgoodwin@vindy.com
Comments
What is this? A private citizen would have his / her face smeared across the page. His family profile would be fully displayed. Charges would be suggested in a way a crime was performed. This is a high ranking public figure which his actions are public record at all times. I guess another "Dick Chenny Move", is in the makings. If administrative action was taken and have been than therefore it's a matter of what and why to the citizens regardless of who he is or is he " Above the Law and the Citizens Who Hired Him?"
Agreed!
Not only that, why is he on "paid administrative leave"?
Not paid is how it should be! And perhaps fined!
I'm beyond a little tired of hearing about public officials being disiplined by being put on a paid vacation!
Can a private citizen ever expect paid administrative leave
from an employer? Hell no!
Administrative leave is a function of the investigation. There has been no ruling on the outcome of the investigation as of yet so it is only fair that the chief receive some sort of compensation while the investigation is going on. He did not volunteer for the investigation, it was thrust upon him. What if it is determined that the chief did nothing wrong? He would have lost all those wages during the investigation unfairly.
I agree that suspensions that are with pay are wrong, but those suspensions have already found guilt by the party on suspension, in this case the matter is still unfounded. That is the fundamental difference. If and when the chief has been found guilty of an infraction, all pay should cease immediately.
I believe Melfi needs recalled. Personal vendettas are not allowed and with track record between these two. It shows a pattern of harassment from a citizen's point of view.