- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Charter schools top city’s in performance

Published: Thu, January 17, 2008 @ 12:00 a.m.

The report is based on math and reading scores over a two-year period.



YOUNGSTOWN — Charter schools operating in the city showed greater yearly academic growth than city schools last year, according to a report prepared by the Ohio Alliance for Public Charter Schools.

The report is based on new “value-added” data from the Ohio Department of Education that looked at math and reading performances in grades four through eight over a two-year period as a way to judge academic growth. The added value is that the state is now also assessing schools by tracking pupil educational advancement over a period of time, rather than just through one-shot achievement testing.

Only seven of the 10 charter schools operating in Youngstown with pupils in those grade levels are part of the state’s value-added data. Those schools not on the list didn’t have two years of data to report to the state for comparison purposes.

OAPCS said its report shows that 57 percent of the seven local charter schools met or exceeded the state’s academic growth expectation between 2005-06 and 2006-07. Only 38 percent of the 16 public city schools reviewed by the state met or exceeded the state’s growth expectation, the report said.

The report used the state value-added data to look at all of Ohio’s Big 8 public school districts and 115 of the charter schools that operate in their locales and found that the charters outperformed the public schools in five of those districts — Youngstown, Akron, Cincinnati, Dayton and Toledo — in terms of performance growth in reading and math.

Only the Canton and Cleveland public schools outperformed the charter schools in their areas, according to OAPCS.

“We’ve been able to make great gains by focusing on teaching to the [state] content standards,” said Barbara Curtis-Murphy, principal of Eagle Heights Academy on Market Street, which exceeded state growth expectations.

Eagle Heights uses “data-driven instruction,” she said, explaining that the school makes curricular decisions by carefully monitoring school data at least four times a year and making teaching adjustments accordingly.

The school, which has 900 children in kindergarten through the eighth grade, has a strong involvement with parents and the community and focuses on professional development, she said.

“The news here is that community charter schools in Ohio’s Big 8 districts — home to 66 percent of all Ohio charter schools — are performing well and, in most cases, exceeding the performance of the traditional schools,” said Bill Sims, OAPCS president and CEO.

Karla Carruthers, ODE spokeswoman, said the OAPCS report is accurate but cautioned that it represents only one year of comparison and only one aspect of the state’s performance review. It isn’t a trend at this point, she said.

Carruthers said the state has been urged by schools for years to include year-to-year performance comparisons rather than rely only on the results of one-time achievement testing to assess schools on the state local report card.

The new value-added data was prepared separately but will become a regular part of the local report card ratings coming out in August, she said.

“The issue is not charter schools. The issue is students achieving. Charters and publics overall need to perform better,” said Dr. Wendy Webb, Youngstown schools superintendent.

OAPCS feels the value-added information reflects more on the quality that goes into a school than does proficiency testing, Sims said. He noted that charter schools have “taken a beating” on those tests, often because they enroll children who aren’t performing well in the traditional public school environment.

This shows progress, he said, explaining that it means the charter schools are helping their pupils advance and make gains.

“Charter school leaders appreciate the value-added tool because it provides them with a metric for expressing individual student growth,” Sims said.

“The educational leaders of public and charter schools are people committed to being part of the educational solution and, while resources alone are not the answer, the funding situation is pitting schools against schools and causing a side effect of students bouncing from one school to another,” said Webb.

“The school funding system must be fixed. Schools need adequate, unrestricted funds that free educational leaders up to meet the needs of the population of students each district serves,” she said. “Our goal should be every child receives a thorough and adequate education in a timely fashion. As educators we will continue to seek differentiated instructional pedagogy to help students learn at a faster pace.”



1Education_Vote(17 comments)posted 8 years, 6 months ago

This story must be the grand winner of the ORWELLIAN PRIZE for journalism.

(note: George Orwell's book, 1984, drew a frightening picture of a future totalitarian state in which Big Brother's official language of "Newspeak" created its own truths: "War is Peace," "Freedom is Slavery," and "Ignorance is Strength." In a less grim but equally trenchant 1946 essay, Politics and the English Language, Orwell decried the "euphemism, question-begging, and sheer cloudy vagueness" characteristic of political speech.)

In the case of the Vindicator story, "bad" is "good" because the "bad" schools met the "expectations" for them set by the state, but the state had higher expectations for the good schools, and if they did not meet these "expectations" this report characterized the good schools as deficient. The fact that the good schools actually had better scores seems to be unimportant. Getting weird enough yet? The "Alliance" for charter schools sent this press release to trumpet its members' success versus public schools. The Vindicator dutifully reports that 57% of 7 charter schools met expectations!!! (That's 4 to those of us who can multiply). This was compared to "only" (Vindicator's words) 38% of 16 public schools. (That would be 6). In this world in which 4 can be explained to be better than 6, I guess the following statistics make perfect sense:
I worked at West Side Upper Elementary in Youngstown last year, where about half of the kids in the sixth grade passed the Ohio Achievement Tests in reading and math (the data being considered by the article). This did not meet the expectations of the state, abd indeed, our students could certainly have done better. Meanwhile at Youngstown Academy of Excellence, about a fourth of the kids passed the tests, and at Legacy Academy, less than a fifth of the students passed the tests, but the article argues that this proves the superiority of charter schools because these levels of success EXCEEDED the state's expectations for these students.
Some charter schools are actually good schools. At Youngstown Community School, 68% of sixth graders passed the reading test. But, sorry. This does not meet the state expectations for their students. In this article, that makes them bad.

Teachers in Canfield and Poland have been anxious about the advent of this "Value-Added" scoring. It looks like their fears will be realized. In this weird world, a student who receives a close to perfect score in the first year of the two-year cycle has nowhere to go but down the next year. A score of 90% would then be said to indicate a lack of efficacy at his school, when at an inner city charter school, a child's score might rise from 40% to 55%, a positive gain of 15 points. This failure would then be celebrated. Bad is Good. We’re all totally confused. But according to George Orwell, that would be the intent of the state government.

Suggest removal:

2apollo(1227 comments)posted 8 years, 6 months ago

And that's exactly why the ratings are skewed but the actual scores are what's important. Just like the OGT results which rate schools as excellent, continuous improvement, etc etc. is a cruel joke.

Suggest removal:

3RS(3 comments)posted 8 years, 6 months ago

"The report used the state value-added data to look at all of Ohio’s Big 8 public school districts and 115 of the charter schools that operate in their locales and found that the charters outperformed the public schools in five of those districts — Youngstown, Akron, Cincinnati, Dayton and Toledo — in terms of performance growth in reading and math.

Only the Canton and Cleveland public schools outperformed the charter schools in their areas, according to OAPCS."

Applying the math I learned, that's only seven districts. I wonder why Columbus was left out of this story.

Suggest removal:

4Education_Vote(17 comments)posted 8 years, 6 months ago

Even better -- why not look at all Ohio districts? One of the biggest mistakes the Alliance for charter schools made was to ignore completely the actual scores of the students. In school districts with the highest scores across the state, like Canfield and Poland, the students did not show a gain. How could they? Their performance was already excellent.

Remember, the charter schools "outperformed" the urban public schools only in the gains their students made compared to last year. Unfortunately their students scores last year and this year continue to be low. This data should NEVER NEVER have been used without revealing that the public school students actually passed the test at a higher rate than the charter school students.
At least I can use this story to illustrate the idea of "propaganda" in class. It's the best example I've ever seen of clearly twisting the facts.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes