Youngstown News, Mahoning elections board moving to take Aey’s name off the ballot
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 2 bath
$80000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Mahoning elections board moving to take Aey’s name off the ballot


Published: Thu, February 14, 2008 @ 1:29 p.m.

photo

David Aey

YOUNGSTOWN — The Mahoning County Board of Elections is taking immediate steps to comply with today’s Ohio Supreme Court ruling disqualifying David P. Aey from the March 4 Democratic primary ballot as a candidate for sheriff.

“We’re going to go ahead and remove David Aey’s name from the ballot. We’re going to reprogram our [voting] machines,” said Tom McCabe, board of elections director.

However, Aey’s name is on paper absentee ballots. Absentee balloting began last Friday and continues through March 3. Any absentee votes for Aey will not be counted, McCabe said.

The board won’t reprint absentee ballots, he said. Rather, beginning today, it will include a note with them saying votes for Aey won’t be counted, he said.

Election day paper ballots, which haven’t been printed yet, won’t bear Aey’s name, McCabe said. Voters appearing at polling places on election day may request a paper ballot instead of using a voting machine.

The Ohio secretary of state’s office has ordered that paper ballots sufficient to accommodate 10 percent of the expected voter turnout be printed, but Mahoning County will print 20 percent, McCabe said.

McCabe predicts a 65 percent turnout, including absentee voters, because of the presidential race with no incumbent running for re-election.

Sheriff Randall A. Wellington will be unopposed in the Democratic primary. There are no Republican candidates. The deadline for independent candidates to file for the Nov. 4 general election is March 3. Independent candidates need at least 953 valid petition signatures. The filing deadline for write-in candidates is Sept. 3. Write-in candidates don’t need to file signatures.

Wellington said he has heard names of potential independent candidates mentioned, but hasn’t heard of any circulating petitions or taking other steps toward filing.

As for the board of elections decision to keep Aey on the ballot after its Jan. 18 hearing on the issue, McCabe said: “Our board has always erred on the side of allowing a candidate’s name on the ballot and letting the voters decide.”

Although people who served under Aey on the violent crimes task force testified at the hearing that Aey met the supervisory requirements to run for sheriff, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld Wellington’s protest that Aey didn’t meet the state legal minimum of two years at the rank of corporal or above in law enforcement in the five years prior to the Jan. 4 primary filing deadline.

The high court decision also disqualifies Aey as an independent candidate for sheriff this year, McCabe said.


Comments

1madashell(12 comments)posted 3 years, 12 months ago

the supreme court is in some ones pocket. too bad they can't see that what they did will have a grave effect on our county and our safety. they don't have to live here so they don't give a damn about us. but then neither does our "sheriff" if he cared about this county he would have stayed home and collected his pension and allowed a younger person, who has all of his mental capabilites in tact to protect us. oh well, anyone willing to run for sheriff?

Suggest removal:

2cdy(2 comments)posted 3 years, 12 months ago

Isnt this convienent for the old timer to pursue such a ridiculous steps to avoid loosing. WE THE PEOPLE have the right to vote for whom ever we choose to. Since when does a sly group of indivuals even try to get away with OUR FREEDOM OF CHOICE. Its unrightous and unacceptable. Its NOT OVER yet Wellington, better saddle up for a long ride. Wellington pull up a chair , you know the chair you never get out of much nor can. Its time to get OUT with dignity while you still have the chance to. And SHAME on you for stepping over your boundaries. Remember "FREEDOM OF CHOICE" is the key issue here.

Suggest removal:

3redox(55 comments)posted 3 years, 12 months ago

AMEN!

Suggest removal:

4AMERICANVOTER(6 comments)posted 3 years, 11 months ago

HOW CAN THE GOVERNMENT DECIDE OUR RIGHT TO VOTE? IN OTHER DECISIONS BY THE SUPREME COURT, THEY DECIDED TO NOT TAKE ANY ACTION ON SIMULAR CASES. DUE TO THE FACT IT COULD AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF A POLITACL RACE. BUT IN THIS INSTANCE THEY MADE THE DECISION FOR US. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT YOU GOVERNMENT CONTROLLING YOU AGAIN? I THINK THE VOTERS SHOULD OF DECIDED NOT OUR GOVERNMENT! WERE HAS OUR DEMOCRACY GONE? I THINK IT’S TIME FOR CITIZEN TO DEMAND OUR DEMOCRACY!!!!

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: