YOUNGSTOWN — The school district’s superintendent unveiled a plan that would drastically change the way students are educated in the city’s public schools.
Superintendent Wendy Webb led the discussion in East High School’s auditorium tonight, seeking feedback on an initiative called Framing the Future.
The plan would change scheduling and add two schools to the system to create four separately functioning high schools.
Pupils between fifth and eighth grade might have classes for nine weeks, followed by three weeks off, repeated throughout the year.
By forming the staggered schedule, Webb said pupils would receive intensive help during the three-week intervals if they were underperforming.
The schedule also would allow pupils to retain information they might otherwise lose during a lengthy summer vacation.
Four smaller high schools would direct students toward college and career opportunities but by separate routes.
Two schools would divide students by gender, each providing baccalaureate programs. The other two schools would concentrate on science, technology, engineering and mathematics, or STEM, and some baccalaureate programs.
Webb said the Framing the Future plan is the only step toward the progress demanded of the education system by colleges and businesses seeking competent, educated graduates. She said the old system of education is flawed.
For the complete story, see Thursday’s Vindicator and Vindy.com.
Comments
This is not necessarily going to cost more money, East is already operating under the small school concept and is technically already three separate schools or "academies" within one building. Each school has it's own "Dean" or principal. I'm not sure about Chaney but I think that the same is true there. This is not to say that the small schools within East and Chaney are fully developed. In fact they are pretty much in name only but at least the cost should not change very much and it will allow these smaller schools to be developed as they should have been when they were first created several years ago.
I am not sure how someone can look at the current state of public education in Youngstown and deem any logical idea to improve it dumb. Especially since the cost requirements have not been laid out yet.
Perhaps the plan will cost more and eventually be underfunded, but to speculate on that now is premature and unfair.
I think the idea of staggered learning levels and gender specific enrollment is a good idea.
Girls tend to learn at a faster rate than boys at those ages and the lack of the opposite sex in one less distraction amongst cell phones, knife fights, poor attendance, and subpar learning environments.